by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 29, 2022 | FAQ
No, it lacks the required individual character. It is simply a collection of personal data which is organised in a standard alphabetic way and selects data in the usual manner, which therefore does not make it original.
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 29, 2022 | FAQ
Yes, when the selection and the arrangement of the links follow specially thought-up individual criteria.
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 29, 2022 | FAQ
Generally not: the selection of lectures is prescribed and the lecture timetables are designed to give a complete overview of the lectures taking place at a university or at another educational institution. Lecture timetables are usually structured in a similar...
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 29, 2022 | FAQ
Basically yes, because the selection of individual articles – independent of their copyright protection – enjoys such work quality. In the case of daily newspapers, however, it should be kept in mind that the structure of the newspaper is not protected (all daily...
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 29, 2022 | FAQ
No, in this case, they should be careful. Although scientific results are not protected, refining the material, i.e. the manner in which the lecturer transmits knowledge in a lecture, can definitely fall under copyright protection when the work character is fulfilled...
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 29, 2022 | FAQ
Yes, when the changes to the new edition can be considered new individual features.
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 29, 2022 | FAQ
Whether you can use someone else’s YouTube video depends on the licensing terms set by the copyright holder, usually outlined in YouTube Terms of Service. In general, you can reproduce, distribute, modify, and display videos using the provided options. However,...
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 29, 2022 | FAQ
Take the warning seriously. However, do not sign any declarations to cease without further explanation, or pay any contractual penalty or agree to a settlement. Check firstly whether the accusation of an infringement of copyright is even legitimate. In each case, it...
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 23, 2022 | FAQ
If a portrait photograph is an intellectual creation i.e. was taken by a person (and not in an automatic photo booth) and has an individual character, i.e. the photographer has not simply snapped the person in the portrait in any particular way but rather with...
by iv4n.p4v1c | Sep 23, 2022 | FAQ
It depends on how “important” the person is to the public: Yes, if the person in question is a “normal”, non-public person (e.g. a student, employee, etc.). In this case, it is illegal to take pictures of the person without their consent. The...